Basel ii Association
Basel ii Distance Learning and Online Certification Program
Basel iii Accord
Basel ii for the Board of Directors
Basel ii Compliance Portal
Contact Us
 
 
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Basel ii Professional (CBiiPro)
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Pillar 2 Expert (CP2E)
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Pillar 3 Expert (CP3E)
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Stress Testing Expert (CSTE)
     
 
Basel ii in the United States of America
From the Basel ii Compliance Professionals Association (BCPA), the largest association of Basel ii Professionals in the world

Final Rule, USA
Risk-Based Capital Standards: Advanced Capital Adequacy Framework

Clean-up calls
To satisfy the operational requirements for securitizations and enable an originating bank to exclude the underlying exposures from the calculation of its risk based capital requirements, any clean-up call associated with a securitization must be an eligible clean-up call.
 
The proposal defined a clean-up call as a contractual provision that permits a servicer to call securitization exposures (for example, asset-backed securities) before the stated (or contractual) maturity or call date.
 
The preamble to the proposed rule explained that, in the case of a traditional securitization, a clean-up call is generally accomplished by repurchasing the remaining securitization exposures once the amount of underlying exposures or outstanding securitization exposures falls below a specified level.
 
In the case of a synthetic securitization, the clean-up call may take the form of a clause that extinguishes the credit protection once the amount of underlying exposures has fallen below a specified level.
 
Under the proposed rule, an eligible clean-up call would be a clean-up call that:
 
(i) Is exercisable solely at the discretion of the servicer;
 
(ii) Is not structured to avoid allocating losses to securitization exposures held by investors or otherwise structured to provide credit enhancement to the securitization (for example, to purchase non-performing underlying exposures); and
 
(iii) (A) For a traditional securitization, is only exercisable when 10 percent or less of the principal amount of the underlying exposures or securitization exposures (determined as of the inception of the securitization) is outstanding.
 
(B) For a synthetic securitization, is only exercisable when 10 percent or less of the principal amount of the reference portfolio of underlying exposures (determined as of the inception of the securitization) is outstanding.
 
A number of comments addressed the proposed definitions of clean-up call and eligible clean-up call.
 
One commenter observed that prudential concerns would also be satisfied if the call were at the discretion of the originator of the underlying exposures.
 
The agencies concur with this view and have modified the final rule to state that a cleanup call may permit the servicer or originating bank to call the securitization exposures before the stated maturity or call date, and that an eligible clean-up call must be exercisable solely at the discretion of the servicer or the originating bank.
 
Commenters also requested clarification whether, for a securitization that involves a master trust, the
10 percent requirement described above in criteria (iii)(A) and (iii)(B) would be interpreted as applying to each series or tranche of securities issued from the master trust.
 
The agencies believe this is a reasonable interpretation.
 
Thus, where a securitization SPE is structured as a master trust, a clean-up call with respect to a particular series or tranche issued by the master trust would meet criteria (iii)(A) and (iii)(B) so long as the
outstanding principal amount in that series was 10 percent or less of its original amount at the inception of the series.
 
Additional supervisory guidance
 
Over the last several years, the agencies have published a significant amount of supervisory guidance to assist banks with assessing the extent to which they have transferred credit risk and, consequently, may recognize any reduction in required regulatory capital as a result of a securitization or other form of credit risk transfer.
 
In general, the agencies expect banks to continue to use this guidance, most of which remains applicable to the advanced approaches securitization framework.
 
Banks are encouraged to consult with their primary Federal supervisor about transactions that require additional guidance.


Receive the New Member Orientation Newsletters. Understand Basel II
You will have the opportunity to learn what members registered before you have already learned. Understand better the Basel II environment, projects, careers, challenges and opportunities.

 

 Return to Table of Contents

Return to Index

 Read more about our Certified Basel ii Professional (CBiiPro) program

Read more about our Certified Pillar 2 Expert (CP2E) program

 Read more about our Certified Pillar 3 Expert (CP3E) program

 Read more about our Certified Stress Testing Expert (CSTE) program