Basel ii Association
Basel ii Distance Learning and Online Certification Program
Basel iii Accord
Basel ii for the Board of Directors
Basel ii Compliance Portal
Contact Us
 
 
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Basel ii Professional (CBiiPro)
   ► Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Pillar 2 Expert (CP2E)
Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Pillar 3 Expert (CP3E)
   ► Distance Learning and Online Certification Program - Certified Stress Testing Expert (CSTE)
     
Basel ii in the United States of America
From the Basel ii Compliance Professionals Association (BCPA), the largest association of Basel ii Professionals in the world
 
Final Rule, USA: Risk-Based Capital Standards: Advanced Capital Adequacy Framework — Basel II
Eligible market disruption liquidity facilities
 
Under the proposed SFA, there was no special treatment provided for ABCP liquidity facilities that could be drawn upon only during periods of general market disruption.
 
In contrast, the New Accord provides a more favorable capital treatment within the SFA for eligible market disruption liquidity facilities than for other liquidity facilities.
 
Under the New Accord, an eligible market disruption liquidity facility is a liquidity facility that supports an ABCP program and that
 
(i) is subject to an asset quality test that precludes funding of underlying exposures that are in default;
 
(ii) can be used to fund only those exposures that have an investment-grade external rating at the time of
funding, if the underlying exposures that the facility must fund against are externally rated exposures at the time that the exposures are sold to the program; and
 
(iii) may only be drawn in the event of a general market disruption.
 
The agencies sought comment on the prevalence of eligible market disruption liquidity facilities that might be subject to the SFA and, by implication, whether the final rule should incorporate the treatment provided in the New Accord.
 
Commenters responded that eligible market disruption liquidity facilities currently are not a material
product line for U.S. banks, but urged international consistency in this area.
 
To limit additional complexity in the final rule, and because U.S. banks have limited exposure to
eligible market disruption liquidity facilities, the agencies are not including a separate treatment of eligible market disruption liquidity facilities in the final rule.
 
The agencies believe that the final rule provide adequate flexibility to determine an appropriate capital
requirement for market disruption liquidity facilities.
 

 Return to Table of Contents

Return to Index

 Read more about our Certified Basel ii Professional (CBiiPro) program

Read more about our Certified Pillar 2 Expert (CP2E) program

 Read more about our Certified Pillar 3 Expert (CP3E) program

 Read more about our Certified Stress Testing Expert (CSTE) program